Dawghouse

How low have the browns sunk?

2009-09-09T09:53:00.000-04:00

There's an article floating aroung about antonio bryant not wanting "payback" on the Cowboys after they "cut him loose" five years ago.

Except they didn't cut him loose, they traded him to the Browns.

2009-09-08T11:00:00.000-04:00

Season starts in 5 days. What is a fan to do? We mostly fear the season and hope low expectations means a good chance at being pleasantly surprised. 6-10 is my prediction but I am hoping for 8 wins, 9 if things really come together. There is so much unknown that its not really possible to predict confidently.

3rd game impressions

2009-08-31T10:31:00.001-04:00

A little life on the pass rush, but the d will need more to stay in games. I hate to complain with progress, but am wondering if it will be enough.

Quinn looked good. Not great. But he made some better decisions and I liked the playes where he quickly made decisive throws. He still seems a bit overmatched at times though and susceptible to the d disguising coverages. We won't really know if he can handle that until the regular season. Still, the titans are tough up front and quinn was in attack mode more than not so it was a good outing.

If the browns have a good year it will start with the defense.

Special teams and turnovers were great. But it also means that, 9 times out of 10, the titans win that game.

Bravo to the run d. The dline looked tough and that is great to see. Can't wait to see how we look with rogers in there. That could make a huge difference and surprise the league.

Love: furrey, who would probably start if I was coaching. Royal, just a solid player. Edwards, who came to play. Mcdonald, who played tight coverage. Coleman and rubin, both looked nasty at times. Cribbs, who is just so dangerous after the catch.

Props to kerry collins he looked great. Same with Gage at times.

3rd game was a success. Progress. And you can see signs of how this offense could get it done. Edwards, cribbs and maybe davis could be big players.

Where is jerome harrison?

What to look for game 3

2009-08-28T16:38:00.001-04:00

Offensive line play and whether Lewis/Davis can hit the holes.

Quinn being able to look threatening to the defense. This would be surprising but is needed.

DA just look comfortable, especially on broken or well defended plays.

Solid linebacker play. This is not a position where the team can coach around deficiencies.

Drink beer. Really, this is the final preseason tune-up for fans too. Next weekend you can spend with your family...

2009-08-26T10:41:00.001-04:00

Lets have a running back by committee with the exception that if jamal lewis is having a good game we ride him. Not hard imo.

Liking the new WRs. Furrey looks great. The rooks look promising. We might be ok there.

Not sold on linebacker. Will settle for improvement I hope.

Are we supposed to be excited about quinn? Just don't see it. He might be good eventually. But his arm is average and he doesn't look to be the next Brees to me.

Abe elams twitter account is worthless. I tried.

2009-08-21T10:06:00.001-04:00

For chrissake jus start quinn. We will never hear the end of it otherwise.

I am not feeling the good vibes on this season yet. Worried about the oline and being able to run the ball. And quinn being exposed. Expect to see a lot of harrison out of the backfield. Harrison, cribbs and edwards are our playmakers.

vick

2009-08-14T09:58:00.001-04:00

Don't care much. It doesn't change the trade market for da or quinn. Not that that is happening.

TC Week One Roster Knowables

2009-08-06T09:14:00.001-04:00

Everyone is watching the QB position obviously but it is too early to judge based on the on-the-field performances. I'm most encouraged by reports that Anderson has been mentally on top of his game, which, more than anything, has been what has held him back IMO. Quinn, on the other hand, seems like a guy who can't be judged until he is in some real games. So everyone has to wait on that.

Looks like Steinbech is definitely slated to start at LG. That's good; for a bit there I was worried the constant rotation in training camp was an indication he was either not preferred by the new staff or he suddenly wasn't performing. The safe assumption is that the coaches want to see what else he can do on the line, playing left tackle in particular.

Alex Mack on the other hand hasn't gotten good reviews. Sounds like he is doing everything he can just to hold his own. While he seems to have a great attitude, it might be a year before he is really ready to be a starter. On the other hand, as I read reports of defensive linemen eagerly awaiting their turn to punk the rookie, perhaps in a few weeks Mack will be like a hardened veteran.

The whole right side seems like a crapshoot and likely to continue to be shuffled throughout the regular season.

Three cheers for Abe Elam's tweets. Well, actually, they are not very interesting. But as a clear starting safety Elam won't have to do much to be a fan favorite. I'm happy to have a guy named Abe.

Early report of how awesome the cornerbacks have looked are beyond meaningless. Those guys are of course great athletes and at this point the guys playing man coverage have a big advantage against a roster of WRs who are new to the team. Wait a few weeks at least before declaring CB as position of strength for the defense.

Linebackers... DQ and Barton do sound like real pieces to the puzzle. I don't know another anyone else, and I don't see how people can yet speculate that the Browns have turned the corner at the linebacker position. I suspect this will be a work in progress all season.

I'm far more optimistic about the defensive line though. Rogers is a franchise-maker. And the guys around him all appear primed for a good year. Except maybe Shaun Smith, who fans seem to want to see cut.

Cribbs holdout/non-holdout

2009-08-04T10:29:00.000-04:00

Man, who cares. I love him as a player but his stance makes no sense. He signed a longterm deal as a special teams ace who probably felt fortunate to have stuck in the nfl. Considering that he has not had much impact in the regular offense I don't see why he should expect a new regime to redo his deal. He's still a special teams ace and makes good money for that role. Hed probably fetch 20-30 percent more on the open market but that is not unheard of.

Bottom line is - make your mark in the regular offense. Then you'll get a new deal.

James davis

2009-08-04T10:23:00.001-04:00

Let the camp profiles begin!

Nice to hear he looks good but it is meaningless until late in camp. Even then you have to show something in real games. We do need another running back though.

2009-08-03T09:56:00.001-04:00

Mangini says no vick. Fine. But I think the proper stance should be, "sure we are interested because we need playmakers." And then sit on your hands for a while.

2009-08-03T09:53:00.001-04:00

Did I read correctly that steinbech may not start? What the?

Hard to imagine the browns keeping him if he doesn't start. Also hard to comprehend.

2009-08-03T09:52:00.001-04:00

Joe thomas wasn't very good last year, despite a pro bowl nod. I read that he worked -hard- in the offseason cause he knew it too. That is perhaps the most encouraging bit of browns news I have read all offseason.

2009-08-03T09:50:00.001-04:00

DA is the better QB. Quinn's arm just isn't there. But moreover if Quinn is worth investing in so he can get comfortable and gain enough experience so he can be competent, I fail to see why its not worth building around DA and building up his confidence so he can be above average.

Blog resurrected

2009-08-03T09:48:00.001-04:00

Because it can be done from the phone. And even though the browns bore me to death in recent years, the preseason is a magical time full of optimism and cynicism. I am good at both.

SHINNER 2008 DRAFT REVIEW

2008-09-09T19:01:00.001-04:00

**BIG BLUE**
BLUE Steven Jackson
BLUE Terrell Owens
BLUE Andre Johnson
BLUE Brandon Marshall
BLUE Jason Witten
BLUE Earnest Graham
BLUE Matt Forte
BLUE Michael Turner
BLUE Donovan McNabb
BLUE Dallas Cowboys D/ST
BLUE Jay Cutler
BLUE Nate Burleson
BLUE Bernard Berrian
BLUE Indianapolis Colts D/ST
BLUE Chris Chambers
BLUE Josh Brown

Summary: Big plays abound
Fearless Prognosis: 8-5
Bottom Line: Nut Graf

**RICK JAMES B!TCH**
BTCH Brian Westbrook
BTCH Randy Moss
BTCH Jamal Lewis
BTCH Torry Holt
BTCH Ben Roethlisberger
BTCH Laurence Maroney
BTCH Tony Gonzalez
BTCH Dwayne Bowe
BTCH Roddy White
BTCH Marc Bulger
BTCH Ronnie Brown
BTCH New England Patriots D/S
BTCH Anthony Gonzalez
BTCH Tony Scheffler
BTCH Nate Kaeding
BTCH Fred Jackson

Summary: Mixed bag.
Fearless Prognosis: 7-6
Bottom Line: Nonsmoking Bingo Player

**GECKOS***
GECK Marion Barber
GECK Peyton Manning
GECK Willis McGahee
GECK T.J. Houshmandzadeh
GECK Willie Parker
GECK Wes Welker
GECK Marvin Harrison
GECK Jeremy Shockey
GECK David Garrard
GECK Patrick Crayton
GECK San Diego Chargers D/ST
GECK Julius Jones
GECK Kevin Curtis
GECK Felix Jones
GECK Neil Rackers
GECK Donte' Stallworth

Summary: Dependable and trusty picks abound.
Fearless Prognosis: 7-6
Bottom Line: Velcro Wallet

**JERSEY JUGS**
JUGS Tom Brady
JUGS Frank Gore
JUGS Maurice Jones-Drew
JUGS Marques Colston
JUGS Plaxico Burress
JUGS Edgerrin James
JUGS Donald Driver
JUGS Matt Hasselbeck
JUGS Ricky Williams
JUGS Laveranues Coles
JUGS Heath Miller
JUGS Selvin Young
JUGS Joey Galloway
JUGS Stephen Gostkowski
JUGS New York Giants D/ST
JUGS JaMarcus Russell

Summary: Under-performers ensure Sunday booze must flow.
Fearless Prognosis: 5-8
Bottom Line: Gnathic Index

**PART-TIME PUNKS**
PUNK Joseph Addai
PUNK Tony Romo
PUNK Larry Fitzgerald
PUNK Darren McFadden
PUNK Reggie Bush
PUNK Chad Johnson
PUNK Jerricho Cotchery
PUNK Chris Cooley
PUNK Kevin Smith
PUNK Kurt Warner
PUNK Jonathan Stewart
PUNK Lee Evans
PUNK Ronald Curry
PUNK Nick Folk
PUNK Matt Schaub
PUNK Jacksonville Jaguars D/S

Summary: Some possible 2009 keepers here.
Fearless Prognosis: 6-7
Bottom Line: Feral Children

**TOMSHAK**
SHAK Marshawn Lynch
SHAK Reggie Wayne
SHAK Larry Johnson
SHAK Thomas Jones
SHAK Kellen Winslow
SHAK Steve Smith
SHAK Hines Ward
SHAK Eli Manning
SHAK Santana Moss
SHAK Jon Kitna
SHAK Fred Taylor
SHAK Chicago Bears
SHAK Alge Crumpler
SHAK Phil Dawson
SHAK Deuce McAllister
SHAK Vince Young

Summary: Now sleeping in the big boy bed.
Fearless Prognosis: 6-7
Bottom Line: When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat.

**SMFBROWNS**
SMFB Adrian Peterson
SMFB Braylon Edwards
SMFB Brandon Jacobs
SMFB Anquan Boldin
SMFB Calvin Johnson
SMFB Antonio Gates
SMFB Derek Anderson
SMFB Chester Taylor
SMFB Rashard Mendenhall
SMFB Brett Favre
SMFB Minnesota Vikings D/ST
SMFB DeAngelo Williams
SMFB Green Bay Packers D/ST
SMFB Ray Rice
SMFB Mason Crosby
SMFB Derrick Ward

Summary: Youth Shall Be Served
Fearless Prognosis: 7-6
Bottom Line: Cookie Middle

**DRINKING STARS**
STAR LaDainian Tomlinson
STAR Clinton Portis
STAR Ryan Grant
STAR Drew Brees
STAR Santonio Holmes
STAR Roy Williams
STAR Dallas Clark
STAR Carson Palmer
STAR Greg Jennings
STAR Steve Slaton
STAR Chris Perry
STAR Drew Bennett
STAR Ted Ginn Jr.
STAR Devin Hester
STAR Seattle Seahawks D/ST
STAR Shane Graham

Summary: The unbearable weightiness of Tomlinson
Fearless Prognosis: 6-7
Bottom Line: Alluvial Fan

This Blog Has Moved...

2005-06-06T07:35:00.000-04:00

The Dawghouse Blog has moved to a new location:

http://www.fanmonster.com/blogs/dawghouseblog/, which is part of the BerniesInsidersweb site and accessible from that home page.

Although with the move comes lots of change, rest assured I do not plan on improving my spelling.

Grantham on Chaun

2005-06-03T11:50:00.000-04:00

"Grantham seemed less enthusiastic about one of Butch Davis’ special projects, outside linebacker Chaun Thompson, a Round 2 pick in 2003.
“Right now, he’s in shorts,’’ Grantham said after a morning practice. “You’ll have to ask me in training camp.’’"

Thompson is probably favorite in the "Next Butch Guy to Go" contest.

The Word: Boulware Escapes Berea

2005-06-03T00:46:00.000-04:00

Ok, so Boulware goes on to Seattle. That is disconserting if you are hoping, like me, that the Browns sign him. But BI NMacDaddy BMcBride reports that Savage is still worried about Boulware's health.... which means, if theyfeel that way, it might be for the best if the Seahawks sign him. Or, best case scenario, his price goes down due to health concerns. We'll have to wait and see.

Boulware And/Or Law?

2005-06-02T12:33:00.000-04:00

Peter Boulware is in for a visit today. Maybe the Browns will even ink him today, if all goes very well. But he's not the only big name FA being talked up -- former NE CB Ty Law was a favorite of Crennel and is also shopping his services. I've been reading opinions that are all over the map with regard to the Browns signing Law. There are some definite pros and cons, but is he is healthy I am in favor of it, though I'd choose Boulware over Law if it came down to it.

Crennel loves defensive backs. There were times last season that NE used up to 7 DBs at the same time.
CB is not the Browns biggest need with 'Cutch and Baxter around. But it definitely still is a need.
Why spend big money on Law when the Browns are not gunning for the playoffs in 2005? This sentiment I sort of agree with. But the team will be thinking playoffs in 2006 and it's realistic to think Law would be around for 2-3 years. It would be unwise to break the bank on the guy, but if Law's price is not too high and he would prefer to play for Crennel, then it's a gamble worth taking.
If you can't be good at everything, be really good at something. If Law gives the Browns one of the better starting CB tandems and can really neutralize opposing WRs, then it's a big point in the Browns favor. And it gives Crennel somethiing to work with. And maybe it makes life a little easier for a less-than-ideal front 7. It won't be "the answer," but, really, how could it hurt?
The Browns have no significant young CB talent on the roster. Lehan is okay, but not likely to be starting caliber anytime soon. Crocker shows some promise, but he may wind up strickly a safety and wouldn't be projected to be much more than a nickel-back or barely-competent starter at CB anyway. And after that there is nothing. So it's not like Law would be holding back a promising player's development.

If Law goes elsewhere, that's okay. But if he signs on here then the Browns have added a fine, possibly great, defensive presence. I fully believe Crennel can do very good things with "fine" players (see the Browns 2000 defense if those NE Super Bowls weren't enough). And I'm certain he can do it with great players. Boulware and Law are both guys that could make a big difference if they can perform. And the Browns would be foolish not to seriously investigate and make a run at both. They're already doing it with Boulware, and hopefully Law is next.

Possible Buc Cuts

2005-06-01T12:58:00.000-04:00

Some potentially interesting names could be out there:: T Todd Steussie, LG Matt Stinchcomb, and maybe RT Kenyatta Walker or LT Derrick Deese. I wouldn't venture a guess at the relative merits of targeting these guys, but, in general, this could open up the market and give Savage some options in signing a guy or two for offensive line depth. There are rumblings that the Bucs might even cut Derrick Brooks or Simeon Rice if they can't restructure their deals. Yes, most of these guys are on the downside of their careers, but some of 'em should still have a little left in the tank. And there'd be nothing like snagging some depth at tackle so the Browns would have the options of giving the boot to my favorite personality, Ross Verba. Or better yet, let him sit around with his meathead buddies at his new rural home or at his downtown bar.

Other notes...

RB Ricky Williams wants his formerly huge salary that he previously walked away from if he decides to return to the team. Good luck on that one.
The Bengals have noted that they won't be signing Boulware. Not sure if it's due the price tag, or if they just don't want him.
Apparently the Dolphiins went to great lengths to make everyone believe they would select Braylon Edwards. Too bad no one believed them. It looks especially stupid in hindsight too. Man, Nick Saban seems like another Butch Davis-like dude from this far away. He's been that way since before he even took the LSU job, actually, and he hasn't done anything to change my mind. Just looking at it objectively, I'm quite happy to be a Browns fan instead of a Dolphins fan these days. Not to mention warm weather football teams suck.
This may be just a rumor, but I head the Burger King near Wilson Mills ran out of hamburgers today at lunch. You heard it here first.

It's Boulware Week in Cleveland

2005-05-31T13:15:00.000-04:00

Tomorrow is June 1st, which means some more veterans will get cut and the last of the worthy free agents in the 2005 offseason will hit the market. This should help resolve Boulware's situation as well. The only reason for Boulware not to sign in the next week or so is if people aren't convinced he'll be healthy enough to go for camp. Assuming he is, I hope the Browns can snag him.

Who else will get cut? Beats me. But we may see the Browns pursue some depth on the o-line and maybe more depth at defensive end. We need a pass-rusher in the worst way, though beyond Boulware I don't see anyone. Maybe Calvin Pace from AZ, but the dude has sucked and I have no idea if he would fit in a 3-4.

Well said.

2005-05-31T13:14:00.000-04:00

SI.com - Writers - Monday Morning QB (cont.) - Monday May 30, 2005 10:52AM: "I think it is preposterous that Kellen Winslow gets away with making a statement (yeah, right, I'm sure those were his words) and doesn't have to face the music in the media after his motorcycle injury. This kid is too sheltered for my liking. He's a jillion-dollar player in a very public sport, and he should be made to stand in front of the press and explain what he did and why he did it. 'In hindsight,'' the statement said, 'it was unwise to attempt to learn to ride a motorcycle without a professional instructor in a controlled environment.'' I mean, who possibly believes those words, or even those thoughts, came out of Winslow? Ludicrous."

Like I said, the best thing to do is to pretend like Winslow just does not exist, at least for the next 10 months. When somethng happens with Winslow I'll talk about it, but until then I am done with it. The guy's behavior after this motorcycle accident has now surpassed the stupidity of the accident itself. And that's all I need to know for the time being.

Verba

2005-05-28T23:56:00.000-04:00

The Cleveland Plain Dealer said Verba wants a contract worth $38.5 million over five years. The newspaper quoted the left tackle as saying, ?I played last year for nothing, and I just want to be treated fairly. If not, I?m not coming into camp, and I won?t play the season. I don't want to cause problems, but I had a handshake deal with the Browns, and I upheld my part. I want them to do the same.??
Verba came off the 2004 season indicating he did the Davis regime a favor by restructuring his contract, with the understanding he would be ?taken care of?? after a strong year."

You know, I'd be inclined to agree with the idiot, a$$hole Verba if he wasn't expecting to get a 4 or 5 year contract. I mean, this was a guy the Browns went out on a limb to sign for a few years, then the dude rips a biceps (which, to be clear, was the guy making his money) and follows it up by saying he wasn't sure if he ever wanted to play again. Now he has a good year and expects his old deal to be torn up and replaced by one it is not clear he deserves.

Verba sites promises made by the Butch regime. OK. Well, not to put too fine a point on it, but Butch isn't here anymore. If you want your huge 5-year deal then go talk to him. Otherwise, shut the f#ck up. Or go to the FO and explain the situation, maybe even provide a little second-hand evidence, and ask for a one-year extension with a handsome raise. But don't insult me by saying you played last year for nothing. Seriously, go screw yourself. You played last year (and the years before that) and made as much money as I am liable to make in my entire life. I made 26K the year after I left college. What did you pocket Ross, 1 million+? Get your head out of your ass.

Verba, you have proven you are a good football player. We all like you as a left/right tackle/guard. We love your bad ass attitude when it's targeted at the Browns' opponents. But you've also established you are a grade A dickwad. We've heard about you and your crowd, and we've all met dudes like you. Ask for your next contract. Do what you have to do. But if you are publicly unreasonable you should not expect the public to be reasonable in return.

Speaking for this fan, I'd rather see Greg Randall starting at left tackle than an over-overpaid jock strap who demands he be overpaid some more. You deserve millions of dollars -- which, if I am not mistaken, you are already being paid. And we fans deserve to not hear your whining and crying.

FYI -- If I ever get the pleasure of meeting your face to face, I will be happy to express the same sentiment. You need to hear it.

Romeo Speaks

2005-05-26T09:00:00.000-04:00

Crennel has some interesting things to say: 1) The Browns are interested in Law. I think that'd be great. More than anything else, I think the Browns interest in Boulware and Law is indicative of their realization that they really need a few more players to emerge on defense. I'd rank a guy like Boulware more of a priority than Law, but both would be great if their health allows them to play. 2) Droughns has had a good attitude in camp. Good. I still think it would be reasonable for the Browns to pay him a little more than his current contract allows, more as a gesture of goodwill than anything else. 3) Lang "doesn't look like a fish out of water" playing linebacker. Good. I have a lot of faith in Crennel to get a guy like Lang in a position to be effective, but I do wonder if this is codeword for "holy crap we need a real pass-rushing linebacker." 4) Faine has gained weight. It's good that Crennel is keeping his eye on a guy like this in whom the team's fortunes will rise or fall with. Lets face it, the Browns need Faine to be a solid guy on the line and he's got to stay healthy. I'd like to believe he can someday live up to his high-draft status.

Side Notes

2005-05-25T09:10:00.000-04:00

1. There is no way the Dolphins successfully convince everyone that Ricky Williams is returning just so they can trade him. In fact, I'd argue the dude has virtually no trade value, not even for a 6th round pick. First off, he's just as likely to be a liability as an asset. Secondly, the guy hasn't exactly been staying in football shape (quite the opposite, reportedly). And thirdly, and most importantly, there are a lot of other, much more attractive backs on the trading block like Edgerin James (who, don't forget, was drafted ahead of Williams, correctly) and Travis Henry. The whole thing is just embarassing for Nick Saban, who looks a lot like Butch Davis from this far away.

2. What is the over/under on how many days it will be until Kellen Winslow's house goes up for sale? I'm thinking about 25, just long enough for the second opinion to have been garnered and the Browns to rattle their saber a little bit.

3. Maybe it is just me, but it certainly sounds like the Browns are very interested in Boulware, at least in a "not wanting to sound too eager" sort of way.

4. Gary Baxter will not have a Hanford Dixon-like career in radio when his playing days are done.

5. A year or so ago I would have agreed with Man U's fans that Malcolm Glazer buying the Red Devils was horrible. But that was before I learned more and more about the sad state of professional soccer ownership in Great Britian. Really, it's a mess. The best team this year is the best because they were bought by a Russian billionaire. And the rest of the team's are owned by either overmatched men who don't have enough clout to compete or consortiums that lose by concensus. ManU is already a huge corporate brnad name whether its fans realize it or not. Glazer's purchase merely reflects that.

6. Next up: how will the NFL react to the English Premiership's cozy relationship with bookmakers? A couple years ago I was able to see a Chelsea match in person and could go buy a beer and place a wager right on the concourse before kick-off. I thought it was great. I bet the NFL will make a bunch of noise about how they are investigating Glazer's relationship, blah blah blah. Glazer will come out fine cause he has the dough, and the NFL doesn't care about gambling as much as they care about making everyone think they care.

7. Who will get kicked to the curb first during the 2005 season -- Joey Harrington or David Carr? I find this race too close to call. Or maybe Kyle Boller beats them both (though I actually think Boller is the best of the three)?

8. Jhonny Peralta is solid. He seems like he could develop into a very nice hitter.

9. Grady Sizemore is the future of the Indians. He is the only guy on the current roster I'd say is a sure thing, unless you maybe want to count Sabathia, who's already a solid major-leauger.

10. What is up with Victor Martinez? His approach at the plate is nothing like 2004. And he looks skinnier. If there was one guy I'd have to bet the beat writers are suspicious of, I'd say it may be him....

11. I like Travis Hafner. But he might be more Paul Sorrento than anyone will want to admit. I hope not though. When he is patient at the plate, as he was for periods of 2004, he is a force. I hope he gets it going.

Boulware still on the radar

2005-05-23T09:50:00.000-04:00

Good. Of all the possible guys who could still be acquired, Boulware would probably make the most impact. And if we don't get him, at least run of his price in the event the Bengals sign him.

Pile On

2005-05-20T18:22:00.000-04:00

In addition to the millions of dollars the Browns will surely recoup from Mr. Winslow, Westlake will take another $150 just for the hell of it. Which, is, I guess, the same reason Winslow was riding that gay motorcycle in the first place.

Unofficial Official Word is in

2005-05-19T09:55:00.000-04:00

Is there really anything to say about Winslow being gone for the '05 season? Not really, cause it should not be a surprise for anyone. And the Winslow camp's PR moves remain horrendous; he's not going to be winning me over any time soon.

For now, it's best to forget about Mr. Winslow, forget he was ever drafted by the Browns, forget about him ever coming back, and just move on.

Droughns back, saying little on contract

2005-05-17T13:13:00.000-04:00

Droughns is in Berea and, for now, not holding out for a new deal. Like I've said before, I don't necessarily disagree with his attempt to get more money. That's the way the NFL works -- if you drastically outproduce your current deal, it's usually in everyone's best interest to re-do and extend it. But Droughns situation is a little different since he'll be on a new team with a whole new offense. But holding out is not the way to do it. Being a team player while making your feelings well-known is.

I think the Browns eventually do up his deal slightly, but not a huge amount. The Browns knew they'd have to do something before ever making the trade. And Droughns is not in a good enough bargaining position to turn down a modest increase.

Indians Future

2005-05-14T21:30:00.000-04:00

Say what you want about CC, Hafner, and Martinez, but I think Peralta, Broussard and Sizemore are the future.This will be a fun summer, even if the wins don't add up like we'd hope.

Winslow may write Boulware a large check

2005-05-13T11:17:00.000-04:00

Winslow cap relief?: "If a player is required to return signing bonus money, the team receives salary cap relief after the money is returned.
'We will know more in seven to 10 days, after the next medical assessment (of Winslow) is made,' General Manager Phil Savage said."

Sounds like Savage is waiting to see how bad the knee is. I was a little dissappointed the team didn't take a tougher stance at the "new conference" the other day. But supporting Winslow for the time being is probably the right move. As long as the team has no qualms about asking for bonus money back if and when the time comes, that's cool. In fact, if the Browns never give Winslow a public rebuke, that is fine with me. The money is what matters, and is the only thing likely to affect players' behavior.

The other big news (and the subject of the article above) is the Browns interest in Boulware. The more I read about the guy the more I'd like to see him suit up for the Browns in 2005. And it would be ironic if an injury to last year's first-round pick wound up bolstering the defense with another former first-round pick. The Browns could actually come out of this thing pretty well if things came together like that.

Boulware

2005-05-12T12:51:00.000-04:00

This would be a fine move. I'd like to see the Browns get a veteran linebacker, and if they can get a guy who is as good a pass-rusher as Boulware that is all the better. Somehow, however, I doubt the Browns will be as eager to pay him as much as, say, the Bengals, who are under much more pressure to win this year. So, if we don't get Boulware at a good price, let's at least hope the Bengals severely overpay for him.

Flats development -- sounds positive

2005-05-12T09:44:00.000-04:00

I am not a fan of publicly financed sports stadiums like the Cleveland Browns Stadium, at least when the public pays the majority of the costs only to essentially give the facility to a private business. That doesn't mean I oppose any public financing -- it's just that what is publicly financed ought to be, you know, public things.

That's what I like about
this plan to redevelop the East Bank of the Flats. It looks like public money will be spent "fixing, and possibly reconfiguring, streets and sidewalks, improving sewer systems and building a new, publicly owned riverfront boardwalk." These are all good things. Sure, they are going to enable Scott Wolstein to make a lot of money -- and that is a great thing. Afterall, if guys like Wolstein can't make money developing downtown, then the only thing getting developed downtown will be projects that are almost entirely tax-payer funded and, most likely, not going to be self-sufficient.

People younger than their mid-twenties probably don't remember this, but the East Bank of the Flats was the best thing about Cleveland for about 15 years. The place was great on night summer nights -- jammed with people, bars and restraunts all packed, boats docked up five-deep, and the various bridges lit up like Christmas trees. The fact that it all disintegrated is an indictment of the city leadership at the time (though I really don't know enough details to even guess who's to blame). But the life in the Warehouse District and the abundance of housing now being constructed make the East Bank a hugely attractive area. So in short, the area has the best location in the city, there continues to be more and more downtown residents, the area already has ample public transportation, and there's plenty of space for new development. Projects like this are what will invigorate downtown and the city.

Stating the Obvious

2005-05-11T12:50:00.000-04:00

"It is hard to believe the Indians and even the Cavaliers wouldn't have tried to gain control of this story with a news conference by now."

Damn right. Though I think an Indians news conference would probably help the player, and the Cavs' would probably make the situation worse than it already was. Anyway, the point is valid -- The Browns ought to say something. And Winslow absolutely should step up to the plate and take some accountability with fans. Otherwise he'll be better off gone.

Besiders, Winslow's statement about "respecting (Winslow's) privacy" is total BS and no one should buy it. Afterall, I don't think any of Winslow's neighbors felt like he was respecting their privacy by roaring past their homes in his now demolished Suzuki.

Chad Brown

2005-05-09T16:51:00.000-04:00

Can someone tell me why the Browns didn't try and sign LB Chad Brown? He signed with the Patriots, 2 yrs/4mil. That is not that much bread for a guy who can still play and would have been a very good fit. Too bad.

John Collins: Props

2005-05-09T09:28:00.000-04:00

Just a thought -- remember last offseason when people were lamenting that John Collins was somehow going to get schooled by the Postons on the Winslow contract? Now consider that Winslow's deal was the first Browns contract to specifically forbid riding a motorcyclen (where it's mentioned a whopping 9 times). And consider that a large portion of the deal's value was not guaranteed until Winslow got on the field for an extended period of time. I don't know how much credit Collins deserves here (maybe Trip MacCracken insisted on this). But whatever the case, Collins has protected the team well. Give him credit for that.

Are Any Options Good?

2005-05-05T10:57:00.000-04:00

Bud Shaw sums it up pretty well:

Cleveland has bad luck when it comes to pro sports
There aren't a lot of possible happy endings from this Winslow situation
The team will have to release Winslow to get back his signing bonus; I'd probably favor this option even though it totally sucks.
If the team keeps Winslow that means he keeps his money. Frankly, this is just too wrong for me to endorse. And I believe it is fraught with more risk than the above option.

But Shaw is guilty of strikingly low standards here -- sure, we might not EXPECT Winslow to do the right thing and return a huge chunk of money, but that is the standard as a man to which he should be judged. But realistically, the Browns have more to lose -- part of the team's future is tied up here, and they are in a business where the perception of fans impacts them in tangible ways.

Given all that, I'll say what Bud Shaw ought to use his platform to say: The right thing for Winslow to do is to return (or donate) a portion (but not all) of his signing bonus, apologize to the Browns and fans for his poor decision, and promise to reward the Brown's belief in him by rehabbing and being the best player he can be. The dude really could use this opportunity to win over fans, to gain a huge chunk of respect, and salvage his career with the Browns and still get paid a heck of a lot more than he would if he got released and signed as a free agent who is damaged goods.

2005-05-04T08:30:00.000-04:00

I keep reading and hearing the sentiment that "at least Winslow wasn't killed in the accident." I don't disagree, but frankly it is not the first thing that pops into my mind. Maybe it is the first thing that pops into Kellen's head, or his father's or maybe the Postons', but to me the first thing I wonder is how someone can be so, so stupid. And the second is I try and think of a more applicable word than "stupid."

"I think Winslow is a complete punk ass." Hehe. Sometimes the gut-feeling is the only one that matters. But I still thought he'd be, you know, someone who PLAYED FOOTBALL. Now, I seriously wonder if he'll ever play for the Browns again. Why should he? What are the odds he'll come back strong even in 2006? A broken leg, then a torn ACL will do bad things to a guy. Will he ever be as fast/strong/quick/agile again? No way. When you consider the ahteltic and character issues surrounding this jerk, it should be a no-brainer that the team release him as soon as the opportunity arises. I don't care if he later goes on to be a Pro-Bowler, he doesn't deserve to be on my team and I'm not all that thrilled about him living around me either.

I've read in a few places that it is unlikely the Browns would try and recoup money from Winslow since it would mean the team is not "player friendly." That is crap. All it would mean is that the team expects players to abide by a mutually agreed upon contract. That's called being fair, and in pro sports that is getting treated pretty well.

Finally, I did enjoy hearing one of the Poston's on tv yesterday trying to explain how it is actually a GOOD thing that Winslow is still in the hospital because it means he's getting the best treatment. Ughhhhh yeah.... and it means the Poston's are crapping their pants.

Torn ACL, Lost Cash

2005-05-03T13:48:00.000-04:00

Winslow reportedly tore his ACL in his motorcycle accident. Idiot. Info will be definitive once the swelling goes down.

And his contract specifically states he can't ride a motorcycle. Idiot.

Convention Center -- Smaller is Better

2005-05-03T10:44:00.000-04:00

A new study reports that a smaller convention center would be more profitable than a larger one. Maybe this fact was not self-evident to everyone involved, but now all parties should agree on this fact. It's time for city and county leaders to temper their expectations and, to some extent, stop treating a new convention center as some kind of cure-all for the metropolitan area. Treat for what it is -- an important civic project that has as many potential advantages as well as serious possible pitfalls for the city. It's not a project that is going to be a homerun for the city, and it's more important (to use Phil Savage's mataphor) to hit a single or a double on this project and make sure that the convention center actually becomes an asset to the city instead of a liability.

With all that in mind, this blog is coming close to officially endorsing the Tower City location over the Mall C one (or whatever it is called).

Browns' Winslow Has Questionable Intelligence

2005-05-02T15:23:00.000-04:00

The word is out that Winslow was hurt in a motorcycle accident. Is it just me, or do you also get a "we're never gonna get anything out of this guy" feeling when it comes to Mr. Winslow? Why is he riding a motorcycle when can't practice? Why is he wearing a helmet but not strapping it on?

Of course, on the positive side Winslow's broken leg must be healing quite well for him to be out doing tricks on his motorcycle.

On the other hand, maybe he has a contract stipulation about not riding motorcycles and is intent on not getting paid anything from the Browns.

Back to Standard Offseason Fare

2005-04-27T12:49:00.000-04:00

Droughns wants new deal. You know, I don't blame the guy to a certain extent. But it's going to be hard for the Browns to fairly pay a guy they don't yet know how to use. There's been no mention of what kind of dollars Droughns is looking for, but he does say, "I'm not being greedy, and I'm not looking for beaucoups bucks." Of course, an NFL running back's idea of beaucoups bucks is probably not the same as my idea of beaucoups bucks. If the guy is asking for 3 mil/year then that's probably a reasonable amount to at least ask for. But if he's asking for 4 or 5, then he's on crack.

Contracts are a two-way street, even in the non-guaranteed world of the NFL. It's standard practice for a player to get a new contract after a year when he drastically under or overplays his current deal. But if a guy still has a couple years left on his old contract, it's also patently obvious that the guy is not in te best position to renegotiate. And that is indeed fair, because if Droughns had a big year last season he did it while enjoying the security that came from signing his previous multi-year deal. Sure he's in-line for a raise, but it's not going to be a market deal based on his last best season. The only way you get a huge payday in the NFL is to play well during the last year or so of a contract. Droughns hasn't done that yet.

And don't forget, there is no guarantee that a great season in Denver will equal a good or great season in Cleveland. Remember Mike Anderson? Didn't think so.

Second Day and Overall

2005-04-25T07:01:00.000-04:00

I liked the second day, based on what I've seen. It's hard to make judgements on the later rounds cause you're dealing with players that are generally unknown, but it isn't hard to find something positive about each guy. I can't debate specifics, but I think Romeo got some quality guys that could be useful on defense. And I do believe Romeo will be able to shape a credible defense. I believe the word he used in his press conference was that the defense will "represent."

Overall, I think it was a very good draft. It's impossible to fill every need, but they filled many. And you can see a path for how this team can grow. 2005 is unlikely to be a playoff season. But it won't be too long.

Frye in the Third; a Great First Day

2005-04-24T07:32:00.000-04:00

Charlie Frye at #67? Yep. I was not thrilled about the prospect of picking him at the top of the second, as had ben discussed. But in the third, I think it's a great deal for a guy who could be a legitimately good starting QB. His arm isn't any stronger than, say, Bernie Kosar or Tom Brady (hehe) but how can that be a bad thing? He's also known as fearless and a strong leader, two qualities that are music to my ears. Drafting Frye means that Josh Harris or Luke McCown will likely be dealt, perhaps for a low-round draft choice. Fine by me, as neither one of those guys is going to be starting caliber anytime soon.

Overall, my only dissappointment is that the Browns didn't get a front-seven defender, which they definitely need. I'm not surprised they didn't get an offensive linemen since there was no way any available OG or OT would have been the best player available.

The bottom line is that the Browns got very good football players relative to the position they were drafted. Edwards and Pool can be difference makers. Frye could be a big piece of this team within a year or two. You can't ask for much more.

AFC North Not Getting Easier

2005-04-23T20:13:00.000-04:00

Pittsburgh gets a nice tight end prospect that could really help them out. Cincinnati stocks up on defense with a nice DE/pass rusher and solid ILB. Baltimore takes an explosive and polished WR and a formidable pass-rushing DE. On the surface, everyone in the AFC North is having a good draft, getting good players that address needs. The Browns are right there too, unfortunately we have so many needs....

I was about to write how there appeared to be a good number of nice prospects that could drop into the third round, but no sooner did the thought cross my head than did Khalif Barnes and Dan Cody both go off the board. But it's still true -- there are good players still to be had. And for the Browns to gain on their AFC North competition Savage will have to come out of rounds 3-7 with a few good football players. I like his odds in the third, and think they'll find some decent front-seven help on Sunday. The hits are gonna have to keep on coming for the Browns to make a real big leap.

And in the 2nd... Brodney Poole

2005-04-23T18:25:00.000-04:00

A FS from Oklahoma, seems like a good pick, although I am a bit surprised Savage didn't go with a front-seven defender. I guess he meant it when he said he'd draft the best player. I'm a little dissappointed the Browns couldn't deal down, but it doesn't seem like there is a lot of wheeling and dealing this year anyway.

There is the predictable complaining going on about this pick ("...we could have had XXX instead!!!") but Poole really was a guy that was expected to go at the top of the second round; it's not fair to call him a reach. Safety is obviously still a need for this team, and Poole seems to have the goods. Most rankings had him rated as the second-best safety in the draft and the guy has speed too. And I believe ESPN's Tory Holt was hoping his Rams would take him with the 20th pick. All in all, seems like a player, even if it's hard to be enthusiastic since the Browns have so many other holes to fill.

Looking at the rest of the draft, it sure seems like Savage will target someone who can rush the passer. I also have some faith Savage and Crennel will unearth a decent nosetackle prospect on Sunday.

Unlikely Rumor...

2005-04-23T15:56:00.000-04:00

TRADE RUMOR -- a league source tells us that if/when Cal quarterback Aaron Rodgers falls to No. 20, the Browns will try to trade back into round one in order to grab him.

Well, we're at the 19th pick and Rogers is still on the board. I'd be pretty psyched if they could get him for a fair price, but I'm still not getting my hopes up. And we still need some defensive help in a bad way.

Edwards is the Pick

2005-04-23T14:00:00.000-04:00

I like the selection quite a bit. After all the smoke and rumors, the top 3 picks went down as one might have expected. The big drama was whether the Browns would trade down. It would have been a good move, but after hearing from Savage that Edwawrds was their clear #1 guy on the Browns board, well, you have to agree with taking him. And it was especially impressive that Savage admitted he felt Edwards was at the top for many months prior, and that he thought Ronnie Brown would go #2 as long as a couple months ago. I'm gonna trust that Savage knows what he is doing.

It is a bit suprising that Aaron Rodgers and Mike Williams remain on the board as I write this (8 picks in). I think Williams will be a very good player but I suppose the question marks about him are underdstandable. Rodgers appears to be a victim of circumstance. But I think whoever picks Rodgers will be happy they got him over Alex Smith (who appears to be an ass, whether he can help it or not). It's a little early to get excited, but I suppose there's a chance Rodgers could slide far enough back to make Jason Campbell a possibility at #34, but I won't get my hopes up.

Smith, Brown Go 1-2

2005-04-23T12:41:00.000-04:00

This would seem to be the perfect trade-down scenario for the Browns, or they can take the long-rumored selection of Braylon Edwards....

I think it will be Edwards.

Clayton is a complete idiot. It's nice to see him prove it again today.

On the Clock

2005-04-23T07:36:00.000-04:00

The latest, and perhaps most disconserting, rumors floating around are that the Dolphins are convincing people they will take Braylon Edwards at #2, and that the Browns are concerned. First off, this sure seems to be a ploy of Nick Saban to make a trade down, and I hope his bluff is called and he's forced to make a pick. Secondly, this wouldn't be the end of the world. I like Edwards, but he's not a sure-thing Pro-Bowler. And if Smith and Edwards come off the board it's likely to hurt the value of the #3 pick, but it still doesn't make a trade imposible. Wouldn't Tampa be interested in bumping up two slots for a suddenly modest price? I think so.

Anyhow, I do think and hope Miami is bluffing. The question is whether other teams interested in trading up for Edwards believe the same. Should be an interesting ride today.

UPDATE: Just saw John Clayton on tv and HOLY CRAP I CAN'T STAND THAT GUY!!! He said, "The Dolphins WILL take Braylon Edwards with the second pick" and I think his eyeballs popped out of their sockets when he said "will." Arrrgh. What a loser. And now just because Clayton has reported it I am more confident that the Dolphins are full of it.

My Prediction

2005-04-20T16:33:00.000-04:00

If the Browns must make a pick at #3, my vote for "most likely selection" goes to Braylon Edwards. I am not exactly sold on Edwards -- I think he could wind up being another Darryl Jackson if he doesn't get better at making the easy catch -- but he does make a case for having the most talent of any player in the draft. But I can't quite see Phil Savage getting ultra excited about using the third pick on Edwards and believe Savage will deal the pick if he can stay within the top 10. If that happens, Barron, Merriman or Rolle should be the pick.

Mike WIlliams falling?

2005-04-19T13:32:00.000-04:00

A lot of teams have moved receiver Troy Williamson ahead of Mike Williams on their draft boards.

If you go by recent news srticles, it sure seems like Mike Williams is not a consideration for the Browns. And apparently not that many other teams selecting early in the draft. Like most things like this, it's not clear how or if this changes the Browns chances of trading down. It can't help since Williamson is still unlikely to be considered so high in the draft. But ultimately I think the Browns are choosing too high up in the draft for this to have a major effect. And if Braylon Edwards is the concensus #1 receiver, I think it might strengthen their hand a bit. But we will never really know, will we? Oh well.

5 Days

2005-04-18T12:39:00.000-04:00

And still no real news. Not a big surprise. MMQB weighs in today and has the Browns picking Braylon Edwards after not being able to swing a trade. He thinks Miami succeeds in trading down though. Which suggests what is probably the main thing to root for in the opening couple rounds of Satuday's draft -- that SF and Miami are unable to trade down, and a QB and a RB get selected. I think that would maxmize the Browns position. But, to me, it still seems like the Browns will be in a reasonably advantageous position -- not matter what happens there should be somebody's "best player" at either QB, RB, or WR. Maybe we can't get maximum value, but there certainly should be a lot of phone inquiring calls.

Also, MMQB mentions it and I second the recommendation -- keep an eye out for the Dallas Morning News mock draft. That seems to be the most accurate one year to year. But nothing is going to look particularly good this year...

Finally, my golfing partner on Saturday thinks the Browns have to get Derrick Johnson. Could be. But hopefully not at #3.

10 Days Till Draft

2005-04-13T09:49:00.000-04:00

Yesterday Phil Savage and the Browns FO held the obligatory headfake to the press and the rest of the NFL. As is to be expected, Savage didn't let on very much, and part of the fun is in separating the truths from the misdirection, and sitting back and admiring the deft moves of our new GM (or at least making yourself believe that is the case).

“Although those home-run hitters hit a lot of home runs, those home-run hitters strike out a lot, too,” Savage said. “... Let’s do something positive every time.” Man, is anyone else amazed at Savage's ability to say exactly the right thing so frequently? Or are we all just so happy to be rid of Butch that he just sounds that good? Doesn't matter. When the guy talks he seems to embody the voice of the Rational Browns Fan. “What I’d like to do every time you make a decision or add a player, I don’t want people walking around saying, ‘Why? What’d they do that for?’" Say a prayer of thanks that Savage does not feel the need to outsmart everyone.

He did talk about the possibility of everybody's wish, trading down. I don't think he's trying to fool anyone on that. He also made a point of mentioning that the team's 2nd-round pick may be one to trade, which also makes sense in a draft with lots of good-but-not-great types. Based on this, I think the odds are good the Browns deal one of their first two picks. And it's all but assured the Browns make a deal at least sometime duriing draft weekend.

One thing that didn't seem to come up is posibility of dealing William Green before the draft. The Giants were the last team to be rumored to have interest. But I'm starting to wonder if the Browns think Green's value can only go up the longer they hang on to him. If they don't plan on selectiing a RB in the draft, that could be the gameplan.

Big Ben

2005-04-08T14:59:00.000-04:00

Big Ben

Interesting topic over at Bernie's Insiders on whether ROethlisberger is the real deal or not. The majority think he'll be pretty good, but there are lots of differing opinions.

I _do_ think he'll be pretty good, but probably no better than a solid starter in the NFL, and he'll struggle to live up to his early season heroics of 2004. He's not going to be confused with the best NFL starters. While he's got some valuable natural abilities (particularly his ability to throw downfield on the run), he tends to float balls and didn't seem to react well in the rare cases he was under pressure last season. I expect his 2005 season to be reminicent of his mid-season performances for the Steelers -- he'll struggle often, he'll win most games, and he won't be good enough to carry the team in the playoffs for more than a series or two.

This probably would not be a popular assessment to Steelers fans, but I'd describe Roethlisberger as a bigger version of Tim Couch. Maybe he's smarter too, but that's still a bit of an open question. But essentially they play the same sort of game. Neither have particularly strong arms, but each can look good with enough time in the pocket. And both can make something big happen out of busted plays. Ben, however, is a bigger guy and has more presence in the pocket. I still do think Couch could have had a decent NFL career, but he was a victim of his own bad tendencies and his team's failures. Roethlisberger is in a much better situation and seems to have an edge in his skillset. But he's still going to have to develop. His goal should be to become the best "system qb" in the league. Which, you can probably guess if you read the stuff I write here, is pretty good praise. But he'll have to do it.

Be Sure to Wear a Flower in Your Hair

2005-04-07T16:45:00.000-04:00

Marques Douglas has signed with San Francisco. That sucks for the Browns. It is safe to assume that Savage was not willing to pay Douglas more than whatever was last offered, and Douglas kept looking until the 49ers ponied up. Damn. I commend the Browns on not paying out more than whatever they thought the guy was worth. But it leaves a void on the defensive line.

Roye is solid, Fisk is good backup forced to the top of the depth chart, and I have no idea who is going to play the other end. And let's not even think any deeper into the depth chart.

Perhaps most worrisome is that there is nobody left in FA that is starting material. Romeo Crennel will definitely have his work cut out to craft a formidable defense out of the current roster.

In other news, the Vikings will reportedly not match the Browns offer for Brian Russell. I file this move in the "Okay" folder. Russell is hopefully a backup for the Browns. If he winds up starting it will not be a very good sign.

Lastly, former Browns WR Kevin Johnson is on the Chiefs radar. He's not a bad player, but I wonder when the Chiefs are going to get a WR that actually scares somebody. The Chiefs should have been a player for Plaxico Burress.

Misc. Banter

2005-04-06T14:50:00.000-04:00

Stalwart sports reporter Roger Brown reports that Kenard Lang is preparing to play linebacker next season. Is it true? I'd say it is probable, since it's expected that a DE in a 4-3 is likely to play some linebacker in a 3-4 scheme. Can Lang do it? Maybe, but I'm not going to expect too much. He could be a decent pass rusher but I'm afraid to see him in coverage.

It is good fun to read a special edition crop of Gerard-Warren-Will-Have-Break-Out-Season stories popping up.

Also popping up in the news recently, is a spate of "Browns Consider Moving Training Camp" stories. This year it is Columbus. I'm sure there are lots of reasons to make such a move, the obvious being that Columbus is the "growing city" in Ohio and, gee, the Browns should tap into those fans. But that would ultimately be a mistake. The Browns ARE Cleveland. And I'd submit that the Browns would do better to be more like the Green Bay Packers than to exert too much effort trying to appeal to far-flung fan bases. Heck, I'd even say that by continually reinvesting in the local fans' fervor, the Browns become a more attractive team to potential fans all-over the country. That's one of the reasons Browns Backers is so big. Maybe John Collins reads about how the Cleveland area is losing population and thinks, "Damn, we need to get Columbus on-board." But perhaps he should instead think, "Damn, we need to be exporting Browns fans all over the country."

On a related note, Les Levine mentions that the Browns intend to move their Berea headquarters into downtown Cleveland in a couple years' time. I guess this is cool. There really isn't much rhyme or reason to having a Berea headquarters. Les doesn't mention if this could affect training camp plans or not, but I'd guess such a move would correspond with relocating training camp as well.

Pretty soon now, the draft frenzy begins...

DL in Draft

2005-03-30T13:26:00.000-05:00

A nice roundup of possible DE draft picks for the Browns.

How come the Canton Repository routinely comes up with informative and useful articles like this while the Plain Dealer gives Browns fans somewhat bare-bones insight?

Droughns a Brown Pending Physicals

2005-03-30T10:01:00.000-05:00

Sweet -- the Browns trade away two guys who reportedly weren't fitting into the team's plans in Ekuban and Myers, and pick up a RB in Droughns who can fit into a backfield rotation with Suggs. Is this trade likelly to be a huge win? No, but it picks up a guy the team can use. In that sense, it's a great trade.

I like Droughns, especially since he is cheap and signed for two more years. He's 26 and doesn't have a lot of NFL wear and tear on his body. He can run inside, is a good blocker and receiver, and a solid special teams guy. Seems exactly the type of player the Browns are looking for. While his 1200 yards rushing last season might be inflated due to Denver's history on running the ball, you also can't ignore the fact he had some huge games. Remember when Suggs put up big numbers vs the Bengals at the end of 2003? Droughns had the same type of performance 4 or 5 times last season.

The trade does, obviously, make you wonder just who the heck will play on the DL in 2005. One potentially nice aspect of this deal is that one of the free agents the Browns have been pursuing, Marques Douglas, was last trying to decide between Denver and Cleveland. Since Denver now has a whopping four former Browns DL players, the market for him in Denver just might have dried up. So hopefully a Douglas signing will soon follow.

That would mean Roye, Fisk and Douglas would be penciled in as starters. That isn't an ideal DL, but it's not bad considering it is only March and we've had such huge turnover. The DL needs depth now too. But with the draft and June 1 free agents, hopefully the FO can fill those gaps.

Lastly, I've read a few gripes on bulletin boards that trading for Droughns decreases the Brown's "leverage" in the draft since other teams will know we don't want a RB. I guess, but you have to be nuts to be upset that your team was able to fill a need before the draft. The draft isn't about outsmarting everyone -- it's about getting good players that your team can use. I don't think Savage wants to be clever, just competent. We will be fortunate if the Browns are one of those teams who never get an "A" draft grade cause they don't thrill everyone with their competence.

Garmon Gone, Brown Gone, Scott Frost Stays!!!

2005-03-29T17:00:00.000-05:00

Man, avert your eyes... the roster turnover continues, and it is a bit painful to recall how optimistic I was about some of these same players one or two years ago.

Courtney has gone to Denver. That sucks -- not cause I wanted the Browns to keep paying him, but because he's a good dude and I am still hopeful he'll be able to stay healthy. Of all the number one draft picks the Browns have had I would say he's been the best player. Unfortunately he didn't play very often.

Garmon has been released. The guy was not a good lineman, and he is just an indictment of Butch. The Browns didn't pay him a ton, but last year Garmon was billed as a big upgrade at RG. He was maybe a little better because he could be a load in the running game, but his pass blocking was atrocious. He will be no big loss to the Browns, just as he was no big loss to the Chargers last season. I worry a bit that Cosey Coleman is a similar player. But Coleman's profile is better and, though prone to lapses, there is every reason to think Coleman will be a significant improvement. We'll see. And Andruzzi, I think we know what we have there and can count on solid, workmanlike performance. The question now is depth -- the Browns don't have it anywhere on the OL except perhaps center. It sure would be nice to develop someone who can plug the holes when injuries occur.

Scott Frost signed a one-year deal too. It's humorous at first glance since Frost ended the season so poorly, but the fact is that all this means is he will be in camp. While Frost has a good leg when he connects, Kyle Richardson appears to be everything Frost is not -- steady and accurate. I expect Crennel will not want to continue the Scott Frost experiment, but you never know. Heck, Frost could be improving by leaps and bounds this offseason and is probably booming them at his high school field somewhere. It's still doubtful he make the team.

Earl Little's agent thinks something is up and maybe he won't be back with the team. This is becoming an annual event for Mr. Little. I've always thought he was borderline competent and seemed to hustle. But he is a below average player, and his place on the team seemed to be due to Butch's strange tendencies. At the moment it would seem like the Browns need a guy like Little since he's their only experienced safety, but then again nothing should be surprising this offseason. Sean Jones and Crocker should be in the mix, but I wouldn't be surprised if the Browns found a starting safety in the third-or-so round of the draft.

Trade Talk!

2005-03-29T15:28:00.000-05:00

The Browns and Broncos are considering a swap of RB Reuben Droughns for DE Ebenezer Ekuban. While I like Ekuban well enough, this would be a great trade for the Browns. Ekuban probably doesn't figure in the team's 3-4 plans anyway, and Droughns would be solid competition/backup for Lee Suggs. And he'd probably be cheap for a year or two.

What is going on in Denver? Andre Patterson must have been a HUGE fan of his guys here in Cleveland to be pushing so hard to acquire them. While I wouldn't say Denver is getting bad players, I do wonder what Broncos fans are thinking.

Clearly, Savage is trying to get another RB in here and he seems to want to do it before the draft. That means, to me, that the team is either going defense, picking a WR (Williams or Edwards) or trading down. A QB will remain a possibility, but I think any interest there is strictly to keep other teams guessing to help facilitate a trade. Getting Droughns (or Chester Taylor) would be a nice addition that would kill any talk of the Browns picking Ronnie Brown or Cedrick Benson, but there hasn't exactly been a lot of buzz about the Browns going RB anyway.

Garmon Gone, Brown Gone, Scott Frost Stays!!!

2005-03-29T11:21:00.000-05:00

Bygone First Round Picks

2005-03-25T10:09:00.000-05:00

Courtney Brown supposedly planned on picking his new team yesterday. But since Brown didn't make a decision yesterday, it's probably safe to assume he not getting a great offer from anyone just yet. The likely places are Denver or Washington. I doubt it will be the Browns. That's too bad, I think. It would sure be cool to see him line up at OLB.

Also, coaches and GMs are apparently wondering whether or not Tim Couch even wants to try and continue his NFL career. Couch has been as much of a presence to NFL teams as he has been in the media lately -- that it, invisible. Maybe he should start a lunch club with Cade McNown and Akili Smith.

Savage Draft Prep

2005-03-24T11:51:00.000-05:00

Interesting article on Savage and the team's preparation for the draft. I continue to like how Savage has kept everyone guess what the team is intertested in. I think it's because he genuinely has not made up his mind on much, and he's serious about drafting the best player available. If Aaron Rodgers and Ronnie Brown go 1-2, the Browns will pretty much have the pick of the draft. But unless a couple clear-cut prospects emerge at the top of the draft, it still seems improbably the Browns can trade out of that pick. Braylon Edwards name is floated as a possible pick at #3.

Getting Enjoyment from Getting Billick Annoyed

2005-03-22T12:27:00.000-05:00

"There really was not much of a likelihood that we were going to let him go," Billick said. "It's unfortunate that Cleveland put us in that position, and it's great for Chester because he's going to get a nice payday, but it's not going to prevent us from doing anything further in free agency.

"It doesn't carry with it any dead money or constraints for next year. In that sense, it kind of just artificially pushes the cap up, and most teams choose not to do that.

"There are certain things you do to be competitive and improve your team. By the same token, there are things that you don't do, simply because, at the end of the day, it's not healthy for the league, for the cap so to speak. It artificially pushes it up for everybody. We've held true to that philosophy, so [signing other teams' restricted free agents] is not something that we have done nor a lot of other teams do."

Oh waaaaaaaaaaaagh. Suddenly the man who stood by his roster that includes a murdered and a drub-dealer is concerned about the health of the league? Ha!

Bill, THERE ARE INDEED THINGS THAT YOU SHOULDN'T DO -- LIKE STEALING ANOTHER CITY'S F***ING TEAM. Because, you know, simply put, [stealing another city's football team] is not something most cities do.

Silas' Replacement

2005-03-22T09:27:00.000-05:00

Pay Phil Jackson. He'll be worth $16 Mil or whatever ungodly sum he wants. He'll be good for LeBron, which is good for the team, which is great for the city. And players will want to play for him, even ones who aren't currently on the Cavs roster.

Ozzie Matches Taylor Sheet

2005-03-22T09:20:00.000-05:00

The Ravens opted to pay Chester Taylor 3 million. Reports are that Phil Savage was obviously dissappointed. It think it's fair to say that Savage was really counting on Taylor coming in and really pushing Suggs. And I have to say that, after reading about Taylor for the last 5 days, I'd grow accustomed to the idea of him being on the team and am also dissappointed he won't be joining us. But, as we've all said from the start of this, at least we've forced Baltimore's hand a little bit and helped eat up a bit of their cap space.

The most interesting thing about all that is that Savage has publicly stated the team will pursue another running back. That doesn't mean RB is the way to go in the draft, but I do love the position Savage has manuevered pre-draft. If you are another NFL team, do you have any idea what the Browns would do at #3? If you are, say, the Cardinals and want a RB do you have any confidence one of the top RBs will be there after the Browns pick? Think this sort of uncertainty might motivate teams to try and trade up? Hope so.

In free agency and the trade market, there are a lot of names out there at RB but not many that seem to fit what the Browns want -- which is a young veteran that won't cost too much. Forget about Alexander and James, and probably Henry too. Anthony Thomas might be interesting but probably unlikely. I'd like to see a guy like Najah Davenport if the Browns can wrestle him away for a 5th or 6th round pick (which is, unlikely but could happen closer to camp in this market). Who else? I really can't think of too many guys. I'll let Savage figure that out.

Silas Gone In a Flash

2005-03-21T15:01:00.000-05:00

I've done almost no Cavs blogging recently because, once the season got rolling, there just hasn't been much to say -- the team has been improved, LeBron is ridiculous, and they should make the playoffs and maybe even get home-court in the first round. Well, the last few weeks have diminished the chances of home-court, and the Cavs might even be sweating for a playoff spot if this keeps up. Along the way, Paul Silas seems to have been acting stranger and stranger. He's had some curious feuds throughout the year, and then yesterday I was pretty shocked to see that McGinnis, who's been playing very uninspired ball, not only lost his starting spot but _didn't even play_ in a game where Eric Snow wasn't very effective. What gives?

What gives, apparently, is Paul Silas, who was fired today in a rather surprising move by the Cavs. At least, I'm rather shocked if only because it is late in a year which the team will hopefully represent themselves well in the playoffs. But on the other hand, Silas has been acting quite a bit like my 7th-grade basketball coach, with the benchings and all. It's almost like he got the Butch Davis disease or something. I don't think Silas will have left many friends when his plane takes off from Cleveland for the last time.

But now the Cavs are going to be desperate for a solidifying coach. And with LeBron in town, keeping him both happy and developing is a huge concern. With some new questions already surrounding the circus-like new ownership, the franchise could be on the verge of some chaotic episodes. Let's pray that isn't the case. Cause if the team fails to improve and if the story ends with LeBron bolting elsewhere in a couple seasons years, then we might all be better off following him out of town. As much as I love the Browns, such an outcoome would be devastating to this city which is already in shambles, and not just from a sporting perspective.

Lerner Speaks

2005-03-21T14:59:00.000-05:00

Very interesting interview with Randy Lerner. It seems that Randy, at least, hasn't drunk the Kool-Aid yet. That seems like a good thing. Best quotes:

"It means that I don't think we're in a position to be self-congratulatory right now. I think we have far more to prove than we do to be proud of."

"while change always breeds optimism, I think that to allow it to make that optimism somehow a crutch is a mistake I'd rather not make again

Chester Taylor Offer Sheet

2005-03-18T14:13:00.000-05:00

Man, Phil Savage sure is, as they say, moving confidently in the direction of his dreams... Baltimore restricted FA RB Chester Taylor signed a generous offer sheet with the Browns. Basically it's a 3 mil, one year deal. And I'll be surprised if Baltimore wants to match that. There are a few things that seem to be at play here:

The contract numbers are high for a guy with Taylor's experience. That means one or more things:
- Savage REALLY likes Taylor.
- The contract is artificially high, and Savage and Taylor have an agreement for a longer term deal if the Ravens don't match.
- Savage feels the team has a dire need for another decent RB.
In any event, the Ravens don't seem to win here. They would net a 6th round pick, but otherwise the Ravens can't be happy about this. They are either going to pay Taylor more than they want, or they are losing a player they don't want to lose. Taylor may or may not be worth 3 mil a year, but we should at least be happy to stick it to the Ravens.
For the Browns, this obviously means William Green will not be a Brown. Green seems to have proven he _might_ become an alright starter, but he really sucked coming off the bench last year. And he wasn't going to start in Cleveland. Green has some talent, but he just isn't there mentally. He'll get another shot somewhere in the NFL but it won't be in Cleveland, and it won't be as a starter.
The fact that the Browns are willing to invest 3 million bones in a RB says that the staff is not sold on Suggs. In fact, I think it should be obvious not that Savage is not the type of GM who is going to reassure players of their starting status. Instead, everything is and will remain an open competition. It's just like saying of McCown "could be a solid #2, and that's not bad." Well, he's telling Suggs that he's got some talent but he's a long way from being a definite starter.
I have to believe that Savage is intent on extending Taylor's contract to a 3 or even 4 year deal. He'll probably give Taylor another million or two in signing bonus and a little over a million in salary. At least I hope so.
This probably means the Browns will not be selecting a halfback in the draft. I'm not sure this makes a trade down more or less likely. But I'm pretty sure it increases the odds the Browns consider a QB or WR at #3. I still think they'd like to go defense if possible and are targeting a linebacker. But this move, along with all the others so far, certainly means the Browns will not be drafting for need and will be taking whoever they feel is the best player available.
Even if the Browns are overpaying Taylor for a year, the contract is just for a year. It just so happens the Browns have enough cap space.
Man, you have to love that Savage is, at the least, messing with the Ravens. And we really don't care what Baltimore does cause either way Savage has kicked a little dirt in their eye.

Matt Stewart signed

2005-03-16T09:09:00.000-05:00

The remaking of the defense continues as the Browns pick up LB Matt Stewart from Atlanta. He seems to fit the bill of what we expect from the new Browns regime -- a young guy, not too expensive, not the most physically gifted but solid and a guy who gives full effort. Sounds fine to me. Time will tell if he will become part of the real core of the team, but he should at least be a solid starter for the next couple years.

The team also resigned Ben Taylor who, due to injuries, really hasn't been able to show much more than competency. But, kind of like Stewart, if Savage/Crennel think he deserves a shot that is okay with me. Taylor, if only due to his injury history, has some upside left than we can hope for.

Don't Get Too High

2005-03-13T20:55:00.000-05:00

His signing of a couple of veteran offensive guards makes it much easier to accept his early blunders.

That's the conclusion, and there's a bit of valid criticism along the way.

Movement

2005-03-12T08:25:00.000-05:00

Savage confirms Courtney Brown will be cut on Monday, and that the team still wants to resign him. Expect Brown to shop around and consider resigning with the Browns only if no other team is very serious about him. I'd have to think that in the entire NFL there will be a couple teams who would sign him to a 2-3 year deal for 7 mil or so. That sucks. 26 mil the last few years, and nothing to show for it except one great sack vs. the Steelers a few years back.

In other news... Barry Gardner and Kevin Bently both signed elsewhere. Not surprising. Gardner wasn't bad. I thought Bentley was generally a non-factor. Still, it's going to be interesting who the Browns get to fill out the LB corp.

Butch-favorite QB Mike McMahon signed with the Eagles. Probably a good signing for them. You could tell early on that Savage/Crennel were not high on the guy.

There are som rumors out there too. 'Cutch being traded for Rod Gardner -- I'd be kind of surprised by this because it would mean giving Gardner a sizable new contract, and the Browns are not deep at corner.

Also, the Vikings supposedly want to trade up in the draft to pick Mike Williams. Maybe the Browns can deal with them. Some people think the Viking will part with their two first round picks, but that seems crazy to me. More likely, the Vikes would offer #7 and a 2nd or 3rd, or maybe next year's pick. I'd probably take any of those deals closer to the draft, but it depends on a lot of factors. Contrary to what a lot of pundits are saying, I think there will be a number or draft-day trades this year precisely because the cost to move up won't be high.

Recent Stuff

2005-03-10T08:58:00.000-05:00

I like Lewis Sanders well enough -- he'ss a pretty good cover corner, can play safety, and was cheap. He's never been able to stay healthy though, and that's why he has been a marginal NFL player. It was good when the Browns announced they were retaining him. Apparently the Browns had a change of heart with Sanders after they signed Gary Baxter. That was enough for Lewis to take Houston's generous offer. You can look at this two ways. Like Lewis, who thinks the Browns hosed him by reducing their offer after the Baxter signing. Or like Savage, who thinks that's the way the free agency game is played, and who made a bit of a statement that contract offers have a quick shelf life. Savage's words may not go over so well with players and seem a bit Butch-esque, but they are true.

http://www.cleveland.com/sportsflash/football/index.ssf?/base/sports-8/1110441415175800.xml&storylist=football
It's always nice to hear how close to the cap the Steelers are. In fact, I think the Steelers are not quite as well off as you'd think coming off a 15-1 season. They still have a great defense and are strong on both line, so they will remain a good team. But they will lose an offensive presence in Burress (who, despite sayiing he'd now consider a 1-year offer from the Steelers, seems to be too expensive for the Steelers anyway), they still seem a little weak at corner, they'll still trot out a young QB who looked shaky down the stretch, and it looks like the team will again lose a few starters to free agency. While the Steelers organization remains one to emulate, the actual team seems to have hit a ceiling as far as talent goes.

Dilfer -- I know it's been a couple days, but it is still pretty cool to hear the things Dilfer said coming from a Browns starting QB. The guy might come in and stink up the joint, but for now he comes across as everything you might want -- humble, competitive, aggressive, focused on the team, and he dislikes Baltimore. He's a dude that I have no problem rooting for.

Savage: ""All's fair in love, war and free agency."

2005-03-10T07:08:00.000-05:00

Goodbye Lewis Sanders.

Positive Momentum

2005-03-08T08:57:00.000-05:00

All right. With Coleman in at OG, the Browns now have some depth on the offensive line. The group may not be great, but it seems safe to say the Browns should be average, which is an improvement. Just imagine -- being able to punch it in from inside the 5 yard line. Or on 4th and short not always calling a pass play. Gosh, that would be nice. Heck, two years ago we were thinking Faine would be the start of an improved o-line. Now, Faine is probably the weak link among the starters, and is not even guaranteed a job.

Obviously I'm quite optimistic about the Browns offseason moves - dropping Warren, and getting a CB, two OGs, and a QB. They are not doing anything fancy, just the fundamental stuff, which is a big improvement over recent history. At this point, I think we just have to hope it keeps up and by the time training camp comes around the Browns have a large influx of football talent. They certainly are well on their way.

Looking at the moves so far, it seems clear that Savage is addressing the team's obvious needs now (OL, CB, QB) so they can pick the BPA in the draft. Who that will be or even who the likely candidates are is still to be determined. But it is all about having options, and being able to choose among a variety of players. Not only will that result in the BPA, but it means other teams don't know what to expect from the Browns, which may facilitate a trade.

I'd have to think right now the Browns would pick a defensive player with the #3 pick. Romeo is going to need the right guys to make the switch to a 3-4, and I fully expect the Browns to pick a couple linebackers/former defensive ends. But in the first round nothing is guaranteed. The good news is if the Browns can't trade down and don't find the defensive player they want at #3, they should have their choice of a couple very good RB and WR prospects and possibly a QB to groom. Not a bad worst-case scenario.

Cosey In Cleveland!!!

2005-03-07T22:11:00.000-05:00

Wow, it keeps getting better!!! Coleman signs, and for a reasonable/low dollar amount! More on this tomorrow when I have time.

MMQB Notes

2005-03-07T13:32:00.000-05:00

Peter King thinks the Cowboys are the NFL's most improved team this offseason. I don't necessarily disagree, and don't think the Browns would qualify, but, really, what have the Cowboys done so far? They've paid big money to free agents. Are guard Marco Rivera and defensive tackle Jason Ferguson THAT good? I really do like Anthony Henry, but that signing hasn't exactly gotten rave reviews in all quarters. Bledsoe will look good for the first few games before struggling. Ferguson is probably an improvement for their DL but is he worth 5 million a year? All I see is Jerry Jones mortgaging a bit of the future to give Parcells a chance to compete before retiring, and Peter King thinking the glass half full because Parcells is one of his favorites.

Other bits from King:

He thinks Dilfer is worse than Holcomb. He is right that most statistics favor Holcomb. Except for winning percentage. Both sides of this argument make sense, but I'm strongly in favor of Dilfer just based on what it says about the type of team Savage seems to want to build.
He says Matt Leinhart won't call him back to confirm/deny that he will stay in school. If Leinhart enters the supplemental draft, the Browns might have a shot at him, especially if the 49ers and Cardinals take QBs with their first picks. The Cardinals, though, just signed Warner for a year so they may not be thinking of grooming a QB.

Dilfer On Board!!!

2005-03-05T22:47:00.000-05:00

The Browns have essentially traded Gerard Warren for Trent Dilfer. My opinion: it's awesome!

A week or two ago I didn't even think Dilfer was an option. But the guy is EXACTLY the type of QB I've been hoping the Browns would go after, and I couldn't be happier -- it's 11PM Saturday night, the wife and baby have gone off to bed, and here I am in the basement celebrating the Browns new QB and cracking open another Burning River. Ah, the life of a 30-year old Browns fan in 2005.

Anyway, I think the Dilfer signing makes it official -- the Browns are going to be a real freaking football team in 2005. No more drafting a fancy highly touted rookie that winds up doing nothing. No more BS from the front office. No more expectations that stretch the bounds of reality. Nope, these Browns are being rebuilt from the ground up the way they have desperately needed to be -- signing offensive guards and cornerbacks and veteran quarterbacks. I really could not be happier with the direction things have been going and have more and more faith that Phil Savage and Romeo Crennel are the right guys to lead this team.

One other note -- if you read Savage's press conference from the other day he said something about backup QBs Luke McCown and Josh Harris that was very illuminating. He said something like, "those guys have a great chance to be solid #2 guys in this leauge, and that isn't too bad." THAT is what a GM should say. Compare that with the rhetoric spouted from Butch Davis and Terry Robiskie -- they'd being saying stuff like, "these guys could be great QBs in this league." No, Savage is smarter than that; he knows that 1) having a job in the NFL is "not bad," and 2) the key to any successful organization, even (or respecially) one made up of "professionals," is for everyone to keep striving to be better. Besides, it's the truth that a guy like McCown is not even yet cut out for second string. And if Savage's comments ruffle a few feathers then so be it -- I hope McCown or Harris prove him wrong.

Savage to C Brown: We Like You

2005-03-05T16:29:00.000-05:00

Man, there is more happening that I have time to write about. But I like hering this from Phil Savage: "We want him on our team." I second that, and really hope the Browns and Brown can reach an agreement.

Other highlights from the press conference:

On the O-line and other FA priorities: "That certainly is a priority for us. We felt like we're not even going to get the kite off the ground until we get the guard-center-guard situation rectified. That's not saying anything about Jeff Faine. We feel good about him." Angels should be singing over Cleveland at this statement.

On Chaun Thompson in the 3-4, and the 3-4: "He may have some untapped rush potential." Yep, I agree. C Brown is the interesting guy, but Thompson could do some things too. Savage also said they are looking at guys who could play LB in the 3-4, whether that is former DE-types, or big LBs.

UM, I guess that is it. Let the record state I am still pretty excited about inking Gary Baxter. We could probably use an upgrade at the other corner, but even as-is the secondary looks like it will be fine, assuming Sean Jones is decent. Now, let's hope Cosey Coleman signs on -- that's a signing that would transform the offensive line to the point that the Browns will actually have some _depth_ there. If theyh get Coleman, then we'll need a QB and maybe a LB before the draft, and we will all be feeling pretty good.

Baxter a Brown, Holcomb a Bill

2005-03-05T16:16:00.000-05:00

CB Gary Baxter is a nice pickup for the Browns. He certainly compares favorably with Anthony Henry, and many (including Phil Savage) think he is better. I've always had a favorable impression of the guy but truthfully haven't seen enough of him to know just how excited we all should be. But I know the Browns desperately needed a veteran corner and it was going to be nearly impossible to find one without breaking the bank. They paid Baxter plenty of money, but it seems like a reasonable deal for both sides.

Holcomb, on the other hand, opted to join the Bills for less money than the Browns were offering. I don't really blame him since the Browns weren't that excited to get him signed, and he'll have a decent shot at starting if JP Losman struggles. The Browns will obviously have to focus on getting a QB. Trent Dilfer has ben mentioned and I think he'd be a fantastic choice. A few other names out there seem attractive, but it's nto clear who the Browns are focusing on.

Also, P Kyle Richardson is on-board and will probably beat out Frost as the punter. But it's not guaranteed as Frost does have a good leg, just lacks consistency.

Shawne Merriman

2005-03-04T13:06:00.000-05:00

From Pasquarelli:

He was already projected as a prospect to be chosen in the top half of the first round, but Maryland defensive end/linebacker Shawne Merriman is a physical specimen who might be off the board in the top 10 picks now. Merriman measured 6-feet-4 and 272 pounds on Saturday and looked like his frame could handle another 10-15 pounds with no problem. He is certainly a "cut" player, a guy with a live-looking body and, in a league where so many teams are going to a 3-4 defensive front and seeking hybrid "edge" players, his stock figures to skyrocket. Merriman can play in a two-point stance, then move up to end and put his hand on the ground in "nickel" situations, and some scouts feel he could even play middle linebacker. The defensive coordinator for a team that went deep into the playoffs in 2004 suggested that Merriman is good enough to start for his unit right now.

Frost in March

2005-03-04T12:41:00.000-05:00

It makes sense, but this is the first I have heard that the Browns are intent on getting a better punter. So much for Mr. Frost, who actually began the season very impressively before flaming out in grand, grand style in Baltimore on a 9-yard punt that should be remembered as that ended the Browns season and Butch Davis' career. Yesterday Kyle Richardson from Cincinnati visited the Browns. I guess the Browns could draft a punter too, but with all the other team needs it is probably unlikely.

Kennedy to replace Griffith?

2005-03-03T12:36:00.000-05:00

Kenoy Kennedy of the Broncos is scheculed to visit the Browns. He'd be an upgrade over Griffith in my book. Brian Russell of the Vikings has also been in. No comment on him though.

There are rumours floating around that the Browns are interested in acquiring Trent Dilfer from the Seahawks. He'd be okay. Lots of people are unhappy with the QBs that are available, but I'm happy the Browns seem to be serious about pursuing only nondescript, competent veterans. I would probably prefer Brad Johnson, Holcomb, Dilfer. And I wouldn't mind taking a look at Mike McMahon if the Browns decide for a younger guy, but he doesn't seem to be what the FO is looking for.

RB Chester Taylor was in for a visit too. He seemed like a 3rd down back in the Ravens games I saw last year, and I wouldn't have pegged him for a backup to Suggs. But if he plays 3rd downs and the Browns can get something positive from Joe Achimedeauxoxo(sp? - sorry no time to look this up) then the Browns might be alright with that kind of trio.

LB Matt Stewart (Falcons) was also in. I don't know much about him other than he fits the hardworking profile the Browns are seeking. That's enough for me at this point. He's visiting other teams however so it may not be likely he signs with the Browns.

For the most part the caliber of FA that the Browns have been talking to has been better than what I expected. Andruzzi is not a cheap signing compared to, say, Kelvin Garmon. Kennedy and Stewart would command significant contracts too. But it says something that the Browns are considering guys like that at those positions -- OG, LB, S -- and not throwing money around at QB, RB or WR. If this keeps up I do like the chances that the 2005 Browns will be a much tougher opponent, with something in the vein of the 2002 and 2003 Carolina Panthers being the model to follow.

Henry Gone

2005-03-03T06:38:00.000-05:00

Dude, Dallas paid him a crapload of money. It sucks to lose him, but it most definitely does not suck to refrain from overpaying by a factor of 2. Still, the Browns sure have a lot of wholes to fill...

OG Help, Resignings

2005-03-03T06:14:00.000-05:00

Great news -- New England Patriots offensive guard Joe Andruzzi has signed with the Browns. That means guys like DeMar will be backups like they really ought to be at this stage of their career. It means Fowler will probably remain strictly a center, the only position where he as looked good. It means the FO are apparently serious about reworking the interior of the offensive line.

I don't know all the details about Andruzzi other than he is kind of a midlevel FA and an 8-year veteran who has won in NE. He has two Super Bowl rings. And he is known universally as a smart, tough player on the field and a smart, generous man off it. So far it sems like Savage and Crenell has held up their word on this one.

Yesterday was also the day the Browns retained Roye and Ross Verba. Both were assets in 2004. Roye is certainly penciled in on the outside DL, and Verba is either going to stay at LT or move inside to guard. If he moves to guard, Kelvin Garmon would get bumped. Anyway, Roye is a good citizen while Verba seems to be a meathead. I like him as a football player but he appears to have an overinflated sense of self off the field. I can live with and maybe be happy he is one the Browns, but I'm glad I didn't spend half a mil for a house in Strongsville only to have Ross Verba move in next door.

Cosey Coleman

2005-03-02T12:54:00.000-05:00

The Tampa Bay OG is in for a visit today, apparently. He would be a great signing if they could get him. In fact, the Browns apparent interest in upgrading the guards is a promising sign. As many people were proposing during the last two offseasons, improving the Browns guard play would be the quickest way to improving the offense.

2005-03-02T12:49:00.000-05:00

Len Pasqerelli reports, "Neither the 49ers nor any other team in the top five will have the option of trading down in the first round because no one is anxious to deal up." I am starting reconcile myself with the likeliehood that the Browns will have to pick at #3. But I don't think it is as bad as some people are suggesting. Maybe the Browns won't get a very good offer to trade down, but they should at least get a good player.

Another quote: "As noted here last week, Holcomb isn't going to get a better gig than the one being offered him in Cleveland." I think he's right on that. The Browns have offered Kelly 4 years/8 mil, which isn't too bad considering he is not the sure-think starter (for anyone, including the Browns).

Oh yeah, for the record I still think Fiedler wouldn't be so bad as a stop-gap starter. He's getting ragged on everywhere but people just aren't looking at it right -- Savage and Crennel have stated that the team will win with defense and a conservative offense, at least initially. Fiedler would be a better fit than most guys in that offense. He's also got a little mobility. I guess in some ways getting Fiedler would mean the Browns offense would have much potential for being explosive, and people don't like that. But the Browns just aren't going for offensive explosiveness at this point. They are going for competence and, perhaps, muscle. And that is why the starting QB will not be anyone that will excite the masses.

The Browns should draft Maurice Clarett.

2005-03-02T12:48:00.000-05:00

People are freaking out about how Clarett flamed out in the 40 at the combine and, even worse, quit on doing the rest of the drills. It was, no doubt, a disaster for Clarett. People are saying he now may not be drafted at all and the guys stock could not be lower.

I think the Browns should draft him.

The Browns need a running back. Suggs has a rep for being injury prone. There is no proven backup. Which means the Browns should take a shot on somebody.
The Browns need a short yardage back. You say Clarett is not that type of runner? I disagree -- he is not big but he is powerful enough to run inside and always seemed good at taking the right angle into the defense, which is the biggest factor in picking up 2-3 yards when they are really needed.
The price is right. If the Browns pick Clarett at the start of the 6th round it will be a great gamble. It looks like the Browns will have an extra pick in the 6th anyway. If this price is that low it would be dumb not to take him.
Cleveland is the perfect place for him to play and playing under Crenell would probably be his best shot at becoming a capable NFL RB. Clarett needs a little humility more than anything else, and he ought to get under Crenell. Heck, maybe Jim Brown can help him out, although I'm not as optimistic about that.
I'm not naive about the guy -- he's kind of a jerk, but if he meant half of what he said in his pre-combine news conference then I think he's no more a jerk than your average NFL player. And besides, was he wrong about Ohio State? Consider also that Robert Smith was not exactly popular in Columbus.
He's motivated and wants to succeed. I know ALL prospects are, but most prospects didn't carry their college team to a national championship as a freshman.

Green Gone Too?

2005-03-01T23:04:00.000-05:00

Word is the Giants are offering a 6th rounder for William Green. I am not excited about the prospect of letting a former #1 pick go for such a paltry sum, but on the other hand I don't think he has a future in Cleveland beyond maybe another season. If that is the case, make this or another similar deal and be done with it.

I like Willie Green, I really do, but the with substance abuse deal and the fact that he rarely shows the heart to be a good running back means the Browns should trade him for whatever they can get. A 6th round pick would be just fine by me. Every late-round pick Savage stockpiles will increase the chances he can pick up some good football players in those rounds. Sign a guy like Derrick Blaylock as a #2 runner and the Browns are fine at RB, and hopefully between the 4th for Warren and the 6th for Green we wind up with some guys who can contribute.

Somewhere Dwight Clark is still congratulating himself for getting a 4th or 5th rounder for Ty Detmer.

Warren to Denver for a 4th!

2005-03-01T12:59:00.002-05:00

Wow, I am surprised a deal came together so quickly. And that Warren only netted a 4th round pick in return. I thought for sure the Browns would get a 3rd or maybe even late 2nd rounder if they made a deal so quickly. Really, couldn't the Browns get a 4th rounder for Warren a month from now?

Hmmm, this is going to take time to digest. I am very happy to get a draft pick. And, really, the Browns were almost in a "trade him or release him" situation were not going to get full market value. But it's tough to enthusiastically give a thumbs up or down.

Clayton "Reports"

2005-03-01T12:59:00.001-05:00

John Clayton reports that the Browns are set "at this point" on picking a defensive player at #3. That sounds like Derrick Johnson to me "at this point."

Kevin Bentley free to roam

2005-03-01T12:59:00.000-05:00

1/3 of the great Linebacker Draft of 2002 is gone. It probably is not a big loss. I have a hard time remembering Bentley making more than a handlful of good plays. I won't miss him, but am getting interested in who Savage/Crennel will acquire to replace these guys.

Giffith Gone Officially

2005-03-01T12:56:00.000-05:00

Griffith was a pro and seemed to have his head screwed on straight. He hustled, he when he got beaten. I have never been a huge fan of his go-for-the-big-hit mentality and don't think he was very good in coverage. But as a personality and leader we could do worse. Anyway, so long Robert, we'll miss your enthusiasm and big hits but not your blown coverages and whiffs.

Offtopic

2005-02-26T23:29:00.000-05:00

Just a side note -- if you haven't been reading about all the stuff going on in the Middle East lately, you really should check it out. There are a lot of potentially big things happening. From the protests in Lebanon to the sudden announcement that Egypt will have (sort of) democratic elections, there's definitely something in the air. At this point you could say that a few Arab countries have a better chance of becoming a full-fledged democracy before the Browns could contend for the AFC championship. But, you know, damn it, I'm crossing that Browns/Rest-of-world blogging line I've drawn for myself. Still, if you have the inclination check it out and make your own judgments.

Griffith Next?

2005-02-26T23:03:00.000-05:00

I've been harping about RObert Griffith for the past couple years. I think he always, ALWAYS goes for the big hit instead of making a sure tackle, and he generally is a liability in coverage. Even though I will even admit he wasn't too bad this past season. Well, it sounds like I will get my wish as the Browns seem poised to release him. Fair enough. I hope Sean Jones is ready to roll. That, or the Browns will be drafting DBs, which wouldn't be a bad idea anyway.

On an unrelated note, did you see the Rams are considering trading Pace? For the past 3 years people on the BI boards have gone on and on about a Pace trade with the Browns. It ain't happening, but I almost wish the Giants would acquire him just so I wouldn't have to hear about a potential deal with the Browns anymore.

Also of interest is this mock draft by a former Browns scout. He has the Browns picking OT Alex Barron after the top two QBs are selected with the first two picks. Sounds okay to me.

Let the Turnover Begin!

2005-02-26T07:41:00.001-05:00

First it was Warren who could seek a trade. Now it's William Green.

And Faine has been read the riot act that his starting job is not certain.

Go Savage Go!

Best quote:

Savage declined to say if Crennel's mandate for high character players was driving the effort to trade them.

"I think that's for other people to interpret," Savage said.

And Lee Suggs sounds like he'll be the starting back. ("We feel like he can be a very productive back in the league.")

And the Browns have talked with Jay Fiedler's agent.

....OK, in order....

Warren can either stay or go as far as I'm concerned. If he stays he might not fit perfectly into a 3-4 scheme, but he'll be extremely motivated to produce and get the big bucks with another team next year. And if he goes that probably means the Browns get something of value in return. I'd say this is a win-win.

Green may not go anywhere, and if he does the Browns won't get squat in return. In many ways, Green's problem has been the same as Warrne's -- motivation. Except Green hasn't lacked for reasons to be motivated. I wonder if Savage will release him if a trade is not possible. I'd say that is 50/50.

Faine, expected to be an anchor on the line, has only succeeded in being anchor-man in beer drinking competitions. It doesn't help that after two seasons in the NFL he still looks/plays undersized at times. My guess he'll probably wind up beating out Fowler in camp. If that happens it will be good for the Browns. Savage and Crennel appear to be putting the pressure on a guy who needs it.

I am huge supporter of Crennel's character-driven approach and have not problem saying that it would be better to lose a game or two each year than to put up with a bunch of punks on the team.

Jay Fiedler. I'm a little torn over him. A couple weeks ago I was thinking that, of all the FA QBs to be available, Fiedler might be a guy that was attractive to a team like the Browns. I've always been reluctant to get excited about him, but maybe that is the point. And really, Fiedler brings a lot to the table that the Browns need. He's started for a ball-control team for five years and had a winning record. He's a real pro. He won't command a ton of money, but it might be a significant investment. He's still got a few seasons left in him. He'd be a good fit for a couple years while the roster turns over. Aside from Fiedler the player, you have to like what Savage is doing here -- being upfront about his interest in another player and putting some pressure on Holcomb to make a quick decision before or in FA. And suggesting that he and Crenell have the right idea for this franchise, which is to stick with a solid-if-unspectacular veteran QB for now while the rest of the team is put in order. Heck, that last point is almost cause for rejoicing after the last 5-6 years.

Let the Turnover Begin!

2005-02-26T07:41:00.000-05:00

First it was Warren who could seek a trade. Now it's William Green.

And Faine has been read the riot act that his starting job is not certain.

Go Savage Go!

Best quote:

Savage declined to say if Crennel's mandate for high character players was driving the effort to trade them.

"I think that's for other people to interpret," Savage said.

D-Line in 3-4

2005-02-24T12:58:00.000-05:00

I was just reading Ace's comments on this article regarding the Browns bloated D-line and the switch to the 3-4 and figured I'd throw in my two cents.

Can any of our defensive lineman cut it in a 3-4 scheme? It is going to be tough. I think we are likely to see Crennel run a mixed scheme where the 3-4 might be the base defense, but traditional 4-3 packages are still used often. That's what New England has been doing for years, so it would make sense that Crennel would use something similar. Still, you can count on some major turnover in the group including Gerard Warren, Courtney Brown, Kenard Lang, Ebenezer Ekuban, Orpheus Roye and Alvin McKinley.

Warren is the most commonly mentioned candidate for nosetackle, but I don't really see it. He seems more of a one-gap player to me, and I don't know that he can be enough of a presence at nosetackle. But in terms of salary he really won't cost the Browns much this coming year. He's either got to play nosetackle or he's gonna get traded. I think the more often Crennel wants to run a 3-4 the more likely Warren gets traded.

C Brown seems to be in line to be moved to LB and occasionally lineup on the line and rush the passer. I can see him doing quite well in this role, but it's by no means a guarantee. And Brown will have to take a big pay cut to stay with the Browns. It might be in his best interest to get cut and sign with another team as a regular DE. Personally, I hope he stays and we get to see him bowl over 3rd-down RBs on his way to the quarterback.

Lang has been a decent DE. And he will probably be able to play DE in a 3-4 and still be reasonably effective. But his pass rushiing skills would not be used much and I'm not sure the cost/benefit ratio will be in the Browns favor. But I bet he sticks around for at least another year and does fine.

Ekuban might be the odd man out. He wasn't bad at DE. But I don't recall him being a force against the run. He isn't that cheap either.

Roye would seem to be the only automatic of the bunch. He's played in a 3-4 before and has been able to do anything the Browns asked of him in a 4-3. Unless Savage has problems with his salary, I think he and Lang will play end.

McKinley is cheap and played pretty well the last two years. Can he play nosetackle? Don't know. He would probably backup at end pretty well though.

Who else? Michael Myers is another guy who could stay, but he's the type of guy who will have to fight it out in trainiing camp before solidifying a spot.

UPDATE: Looks like Warren is on the way out. Which probably means Romeo feels playing a 3-4 all/most of the time is doable. I wonder what the Browns think they can get for him -- if they really don't have a need for him they won't have much leverage, but if multiple teams have interest he could garner a 3rd or even 2nd rounder. Maybe it will open up some opportunities for the Browns to swap draft picks as well.